1. Active/Passive Cluster - Can the passive node be safely ustili
Thanks for your comments Edwin. "Edwin vMierlo [MVP]" wrote: > > > > > Also, we know that a single node could comfortably support both instances > of > > SQL Server in the event of a failover but I would have no issue with > > immediately stopping the named instance in order to grant full resource to > > the production instance. > > > > That would be my only concern, but as you are confident that it can take the > load, then you should answer the question yourself ! > Make sure you are also confident that IO paths (storage/network) can take > the load. > > rgds, > Edwin. > > >
2. Clustering with 2 active nodes and 1 passive node
3. Three Node cluster - Active /Active /Passive
Hello everybody, We are trying to consolidate our servers, by moving databases to instances (3 nodes) running under Active /Active /Passive mode. My doubts here are (1) Can we ever do this? I said "Yes", it may be possible but never tried. (2) If yes, how many virtual servers would we need (two or three)? (3) Now with passive Node how it is going to work if both the servers were to fail? TIA
4. 3 nodes active/active/passive cannot failover
5. Three Node cluster - Active /Active /Passive
6. sharing a resource between nodes in active/passive cluster
7. Cluster problem sql server 2000 active/passive is running on both nodes
Hello, Today, during work, suddenly my sql server was stopped, cluster started failover. Did not switch node but started sql on the same active machine. After that I got message that on passive machine also sql server service is running :( I tried to stop sql on passive node from Service Manager but I also stopped cluster. Do you know how to stop sql server on passive node and what could be the reason?? Any help appreciate . Cheers, Bartek
8. 3 Active and 1 Passive Node Cluster in Windows 2003 Server with SQL 2000 SP4