telecom >> Competition, New Technologies Take Sting Out of Long-Distance

by Jack Decker » Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:03:55 GMT

By Christopher Stern, The Washington Post

"Shush, it's long-distance!"

For decades, a long-distance call was something special -- and
expensive. It could instantly quiet a dinner-table conversation and
infuse a household with an aura of anxiety or romance.

Over time, long-distance became cheaper and more routine. And now it
appears close to disappearing entirely as its own category, thanks to
the popularity of unlimited telephone packages. For millions of
people, it no longer makes a difference if they call across the
country or across the street.

What began as a slow change has been accelerating in the past year or
so, upending an industry long viewed as a steady utility. A
combination of deregulation and new technologies has spawned a
sometimes bewildering choice of pricing plans for consumers from
different players -- traditional phone giants, wireless firms, cable
systems and Internet companies. Most of them offer connections for
much less than what separate local and long-distance used to cost.

Further roiling the industry, consumers have begun to embrace
a technology that allows them to make calls over their high-speed
Internet connections instead of phone lines. Such services are driving
prices down further.

The technology has been waiting in the wings for several years but has
begun to take off now that 25 percent of the nation's homes have
subscribed to a high-speed Internet service. In the past few months,
Verizon, AT&T and other large telephone companies have introduced
Internet-based offerings.

The technology is already popular with businesses that have been able
to cut their long-distance bills by as much as 50 percent. American
West Transportation, a furniture shipping company in California, used
to pay $30,000 or more as it kept in touch with customers and
employees nationwide.

But in December, American West signed a contract with Covad
Communications Group Inc. to move all of its telephone traffic onto
the Internet. Now American West's monthly long-distance bill is around
$20,000, and when the transition is complete -- sometime next month --
costs should drop to about $15,000, said Curt Scott, who is in charge
of American West Transportation's phone system.

Full story at:
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04222/358706.stm

How to Distribute VoIP Throughout a Home:
http://michigantelephone.mi.org/distribute.html

If you live in Michigan, subscribe to the MI-Telecom group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MI-Telecom/


telecom >> Competition, New Technologies Take Sting Out of Long-Distance

by Dave Close » Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:19:59 GMT


Jack Decker <VOIP News> quotes Christopher Stern of The Washington Post:


And yet I haven't noticed any apologies from those who still insist on
toll-alert dialing. Isn't it time to abolish that useless annoyance?

Dave Close, Compata, Costa Mesa CA "If I seem unduly clear to you,
XXXX@XXXXX.COM , +1 714 434 7359 you must have misunderstood
XXXX@XXXXX.COM what I said." -- Alan Greenspan

Similar Threads

1. Long-Distance Takes Local Route

2. no longer Direct dial long distance [Telecom]

3. Long-Awaited US Telephone Competition Rules Issued

4. long distance carrier over ISDN

5. GVRP LeaveEmpty takes longer than expected

Hi, 

I apologize if this is not the right site to submit this question.
Please advise me if so.

We are using a commercial GARP application utilizing GVRP. The GVRP
enabled system has two ports that is set up similar to the UNH test
suite 12.2.1.2 ftp://ftp.iol.unh.edu/pub/bfc/testsuites/gvrp/all-operation.pdf.

Occasionally I see that the LeaveEmpty packet is received much later
than expected. Debugging the protocol shows that the propagated port
for the Vlan Id is in the VP state (leaveall has expired on that port)
when the IndLeave occurs. The IndLeave transitions the port from the
VP to the VO state. The LeaveEmpty is not sent out until the port
expires on the next LeaveAll and the states transgress from VP, AA,
QA, LA.

The usual expected action would be that the IndLeave would occur when
the port is in the QA state causing a transition to the LA state.

Is this correct behavior? Reviewing IEEE 802.1D Applicant State table
it seems to have moved to the expected state when a IndLeave is
received on a port in the VP state

Any help would be appreciated. 

Pam

6. Seminal paper about ethernet over long distances

7. Save On Long Distance Get VOIP internet phone service Marketers needed

New Company Launch internet phone service To public
To Signup  For Service and star saving on long distance and enjoy The
service go to :

www.igonet.com     Invitation Code needed to register :     artcancer

They can then click on the flag of your respective country.  Then,
click on the "Sign Up" link.

 will be taken to the Retail Customer Enrollment form, where you
will be prompted for two pieces of information - an Enrollment Code
and your Postal Code.

The Enrollment Code you will need to provide will be My  IGONET
User-ID of:

artcancer

The Postal Code you will need to provide will be your zip code.

You  can then proceed through the signup process for the service!

To Become a Rep and start your business Go To:

www.igonet.net/artcancer To Watch a free oportunity Video

8. sending data over long distance