C++ Builder IDE >> BORDBK41.DLL

by William Bennett » Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:59:46 GMT

When I tried to run a program I have written I get the following error:

Debugger Kernel BORDBK41.DLL is missing or not registered.

I am using Borland C++ Builder 4.0 with Windows XP operating system.

Bill




C++ Builder IDE >> BORDBK41.DLL

by Remy Lebeau (TeamB) » Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:31:49 GMT







Close the IDE and then use Windows' REGSVR32.EXE utility to re-register the
DLL.


Gambit





Similar Threads

1. Debugger Kernel BORDBK41.DLL - C++ Builder IDE

2. Diff between COM DLL, Regular DLL and .NET DLL

Hi,

Can anyone tell me how to differentiate between COM DLL, regularDLL and
.NET DLLs?

I am trying to read the file information from file properties like
filename, version, productname, compnay etc.

But how can DLLs be differentiated.

For .NET DLL, there is a entry called - Assembly Version, but i am
unbale read the string itself - "Assembly Version" althjough i aam ablr
to rtead the version

i have a set of files and i want to loop throug the the files and get
the file information and importantly the differnce bwtween above DLLs
from File version?

Any help?

Thanks & Regards
JP

3. Dependency walker msvcr80d.dll missing coredll.dll and dwmapi.dll

4. InvokeCompilerPass in c1xx.dll, c1.dll, c2.dll

Hello all,

I would like to know if there is somewhere public documentation on
InvokeCompilerPass export function in c1xx.dll, c1.dll, c2.dll (VC
Toolkit .NET 2003) ?

Thanks

Regards

Joseph

5. installing MFC71.dll, msvcr71.dll, and msvcp71.dll in system32

6. static link versus dynamic link: MFC71.dll, msvcr71.dll, and msvcp71.dll

I have a DLL that I have been dynamically linking to MFC71.dll,
msvcr71.dll, and msvcp71.dll.

Question: Does anyone know of any potential issues if I change my C++
DLL to statically link to these three DLLs instead of dynamically
linking to them.  For example, is there anything that was working that
might break when I make this change?

Given Microsoft is recommending that we now distribute a copy of these
DLLs in our own application directories, is there any real benefit in
continuing to dynamically link these three DLLs with my application?
If I statically link, the size of my DLL does not grow that much.

7. Release build exe has MFC71D.dll, MSVCR71D.dll and MSVCP71d.dll

8. Release build exe has MFC71D.dll, MSVCR71D.dll and MSVCP71d.dll dependency

HI,
I have a MFC aplication created using  VC++.NET 2003. When I compile in
Release mode and check the exe dependency in dependency walker it shows
the  exe has dependency on MFC71D.dll, MSVCR71D.dll and MSVCP71d.dll.

I have disabled all the debug info in the release configuration
settings. Any help would be appreciated.

Sandy