Hello all,
Before I get to babbling on, please feel free to correct
me if I'm wrong at any point, and please forgive the
massive long post for such a simple queery!
I'm in the process of designing the infrastructure for
when we move to Win2k network/domain.
I'm not very experianced in IIS and was looking for some
advice.
One problem is our current NT Domain name is no longer
relevant to the company, and so we want to tidy it up from
a user perspective (logging on from internet). So our
upgrade strategy includes moving to a new domain name of
fashion.com. Unfortunatly NT/2k logon uses netbios for
domain names, so our users would still have to use our old
domain name. What I did discover is if IIS sits on a
Domain Controller then there's no need no put a domain
name in when logging on. However whilst having a quick
browse through the jungle that is Microsoft.com I came
across a statement that IIS and DC on the same box can
cause replication issues, and put a heavy load on the
server.
Now to the point.
There are a few ways of implementing IIS, but what are the
pros and cons of having IIS sat on Domain Controller, or a
member server, or in a different forest etc???
Are there any standard practices you could reccommend?
Thanks for reading all this, any help is appreciated!
Matt.