Flight Simulation Games >> The best corporate jets

by Business Jets Flight Site Fsjets. » Mon, 01 Sep 2003 20:26:36 GMT

Fsjets.com New Hot File Alert List
Files Uploaded from September 2003

Hello all Business Jets Pilots and Aviation Fans
New update Aircraft & Bizjet
All of the files below can be downloaded from
http://www.fsjets.com

New Release Area

You can post all different important news and announcements about flight
simulation to this page. All developers and companies are welcome to post
news items to us via E-Mail.
XXXX@XXXXX.COM


The # 1 Corporate Flight Site
For all Flight Simulator Pilots and Aviation Fan's.
Every weekly new Updates Featuring the LARGEST Collection of Business Jets
for
Flight Simulator


Subscribe to Hot File Alert
New Hot File Alert. When you subscribe, you will revecive an e-mail that
lists all files that were updload to FsJets during the previous week in the
format that simmers have preferred since Fs2004/FS2002/FS2000/FS98/FS.
http://www.fsjets.com/subscribe.html



Eduardo Gaviria
Web Master FsJets
http://www.fsjets.com
XXXX@XXXXX.COM
Subscribe to Hot File Alert
http://www.fsjets.com/subscribe.html
Central Florida EE.UU






Flight Simulation Games >> The best corporate jets

by Dashi Toshii » Tue, 02 Sep 2003 02:28:36 GMT






Hi Eduardo:

Very nice site, lot of goodies, I really enjoyed looking around and did some
downloading.

I came across some broken links that you will probably want to know about.

Under "Tools" and "Real Live" none of the links appear to work, they all
return "404".

Thanks for the great site.

Dashii





Similar Threads

1. ToEE - Atari and Hasbro - corporate calisthenics getting in the way of good gaming

2. ToEE - Atari and Hasbro - corporate calisthenics getting in the way of good gaming

Julie d'Aubigny wrote:
> How does "released a best-selling strategy game in the past year and a
> half, with an expansion with regular updates for both the game and its
> expansion" degenerative? Sure, the Diablo 2 1.10 patch is not a high
> priority, but how many games as old as Diablo 2 get regular patches in
> the first place?

D2 wasn't in the "old games" category when the 1.10 patch was promised.  The
fiasco surrounding that patch and the condition of its "beta" release(s)
along with the concurrent departure of many of those responsible for the
game and the company, indicates a company in turmoil, at best.

Much of what was promised for D2 has never materialized despite its success,
including dupe/hack free realms, regular ladder seasons, regular runeword
and crafting recipe additions, etc., etc.

-- 
chainbreaker


3. ToEE - Atari and Hasbro - corporate calisthenics getting in the way of good gaming

4. ToEE - Atari and Hasbro - corporate calisthenics getting in the way of good gaming

5. ToEE - Atari and Hasbro - corporate calisthenics getting in the way of good gaming

6. ToEE - Atari and Hasbro - corporate calisthenics getting in the way of good gaming

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:40:07 GMT, Julie d'Aubigny < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >
wrote:

>Sarah Jaernecke wrote:
>> 
>> > MoO3 post-patch is eminently playable, and not very sucky. It's more
>> > accurate to just say that it fell way below expectations.
>> 
>> That's often the same thing in the minds of many gamers, I think,
>> especially if a game is part of a series that a given gamer is very fond
>> of. ;)
>
>I realize that. I find it more disturbing that some gamers seem to take
>a perverse and malicious pleasure in the idea that something is not as
>good as it could have been.

Especially if it is a game that a perceived enemy is a fan of. Kind of like
putting someone else down to make yourself feel better.

>> It goes without saying that I exclude myself from that statement. Oh
>> wait, I don't. :P *cough*Ultima8and9*cough*

7. ToEE - Atari and Hasbro - corporate calisthenics getting in the way of good gaming

8. ToEE - Atari and Hasbro - corporate calisthenics getting in the way of good gaming

"Julie d'Aubigny" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > wrote in message
news: XXXX@XXXXX.COM ...
> JWB wrote:
> >
> > > This particular part of the discussion. I pointed out that Infogrames
> > > has a bad reputation for releasing buggy games.
> >
> > You pointing something out doesn't make it the real issue.
>
> It is, because it ties back into blaming Troika for something that Atari
> has a reputation for doing. Why is it that it's Atari's fault for
> constantly releasing buggy, unfinished games, but it's suddenly Troika's
> fault because their first game through Troika is buggy and unfinished?

Troika doesn't have a great rep for quality releases either. Arcanum was
pretty bad out of the box. If you want to talk about past performance, you
have to include Troika.