portable >> Mandrake 10.1 vs Fedora Core 3

by john.fystikis » Thu, 09 Dec 2004 00:00:35 GMT

Hi everyone,
i have downloaded and burnt both versions on CDs
which one would u recommend installing on an AMD Athlon XP-M based
laptop?
my main concern is acpi support, compatibility (e.g. not having to
recompile kernels etc) and i would also appreciate an operating system
that is not very heavy on cpu/memory resources.
Cheers!

ps.btw, just as a matter of curiosity, do downloaded linux
distributions support Intel Pentium M (Centrino) processors without the
need for any additional drivers?



portable >> Mandrake 10.1 vs Fedora Core 3

by Dances With Crows » Thu, 09 Dec 2004 00:52:41 GMT


On 8 Dec 2004 08:00:35 -0800, XXXX@XXXXX.COM staggered into the
Black Sun and said:

Mandrake, but that's just my personal preference. YMMV as always.


If you want combatability information, Google for "Linux $LAPTOP_MAKE
$LAPTOP_MODEL_NUMBER" and look up your laptop's make and model on
http://linux-laptop.net/ and http ://tuxmobil.org/ . If you'd posted
that information previously, someone could've replied with "Yes, ACPI
works on the Foobar 9000 laptop with kernel 2.6.7 or higher." As it is,
you'll have Search The Fine Web (or post your laptop's make and model#.)

Compiling a kernel on a modern machine is not a huge chore, since you
can find out everything you need to know about the hardware with "lspci
-vv". If you want something that looks pretty and works similarly to
Windows, run KDE 3.3 with all the eye candy enabled. If you want
something that's fast and doesn't use a lot of CPU/RAM, run fluxbox.
You must decide whether you want "pretty" or "insanely fast"; the kernel
makes very little difference here. Every distro includes a choice of
window managers/desktop environments. Mandrake's default is KDE,
Fedora's default is GNOME.


The processor should be supported without problems with a recent distro.
If you meant "will the built-in 802.11b card work on Centrino laptops?",
that's a different story. IIRC, you'll have to grab the 'Doze driver
and use ndiswrapper to load it. Google knows more about this topic than
I do. HTH,

--
Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin / mail: TRAP + SPAN don't belong
http://www.brainbench.com / Hire me!
-----------------------------/ http://crow202.dyndns.org/ ~mhgraham/resume



portable >> Mandrake 10.1 vs Fedora Core 3

by Bill Waddington » Thu, 09 Dec 2004 01:40:00 GMT

On 8 Dec 2004 16:52:41 GMT, Dances With Crows



[snip]


Or the Intel driver: http://ipw2100.sourceforge.net/ for the 2100.
Links there for the 2200 as well.

Bill
--
William D Waddington
XXXX@XXXXX.COM
"Even bugs...are unexpected signposts on
the long road of creativity..." - Ken Burtch


Similar Threads

1. Mandrake 10.1 can't mount EXT3 created by Fedora Core 3 - Linux

2. My mistake - was " Mandrake 10.1 can't mount EXT3 created by Fedora Core 3"

General Schvantzkoph wrote:

> I have a triple boot system, MDK 10.1 Official, Fedora Core 3 (Test 3) and
> XP. All the Linux partitions are EXT3. The /home partition was created
> when I installed FC2 and is mountable by both Mandrake and Fedora Core 3.
> The / partition for FC3 was created when I installed FC3. FC3 has no
> trouble reading it. I've just installed Mandrake 10.1 Official. It can
> mount the common /home and it's own / partition but it can't mount FC3's /
> partition (the only partition that was created by FC3). The error message
> was that there were unsupported features in the file system. Both MDK
> 10.1 Official and FC3 are using a version of the 2.6.8.1 kernel. What
> feature is Fedora Core 3 using that Mandrake 10.1 doesn't understand?

Mandrake does have the EXT3 filesystem support compilied into the kernel. 
Your problem may be related to permissions set FC3's root user. Log into FC3
and check the permissions set on / .

Now I will go back to the garbage bin and rejoin my retarded peers
as their leader because I am a total shit. Don't listen to anything I
have to say on any subject because I am a total and complete
fuck up.


3. Mandrake 10.1 or Fedora Core 4 - Linux

4. Fedora Core 3 and Mandrake 10.1 install trashes MBR

Like the subject says, when I installed FC 3 and Mandrake 10.1 on my
home
PC on /dev/hdb1, It trashes my MBR.  I have windows xp on /dev/hda1.  I
then
have to go do a fixmbr with my windows xp rescue disk.  Now I have
absolutely no way of booting into linux and creating a boot floppy.  I
tried rescue mode on
fedora core but it does not want to mount my floppy.  Why did these
distro's abandon the ability to create a boot floppy from the
installation?  My bios allows me to boot from /dev/hdb1 but I can't
write to the MBR of the second hard drive either from the installation.
I hope I am not really stuck with my only option being to go back to a
distribution that allows me to create a boot floppy during
installation.

does red hat 9 allow me to make a boot floppy during the installation?

Can anyone recommend a recent distribution that allows me to make a
boot floppy during installation?

thanks in advance,
ravi

5. Linux install stalls - with Mandrakelinux 10.1 AND Fedora Core 2 - Linux